The Evolution of Nigeria’s External Debt: From Obasanjo to Tinubu

Nigeria’s external debt profile has experienced significant shifts over the last two decades, influenced by varying economic strategies and global financial dynamics. This article examines the trajectory of Nigeria’s external debt from President Olusegun Obasanjo’s administration (1999–2007) to the current administration of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu (2023–present), analyzing the factors behind the borrowings, their implications, and the pervasive role of corruption.

  1. Olusegun Obasanjo (1999–2007): A Legacy of Debt Relief

When President Olusegun Obasanjo assumed office in 1999, Nigeria’s external debt stood at a staggering $28 billion. Much of this debt was inherited from previous military regimes and was owed to the Paris Club of creditors. Obasanjo’s administration prioritized debt relief as a cornerstone of its economic policy.

In 2005, the administration successfully negotiated a historic debt relief deal with the Paris Club. This agreement resulted in the cancellation of $18 billion of Nigeria’s debt, with the government paying $12 billion to clear the remaining balance. By the end of Obasanjo’s tenure in 2007, Nigeria’s external debt had been reduced to just $2.11 billion, marking a significant turnaround.

While this achievement was celebrated globally, concerns lingered about the potential diversion of freed-up resources. Allegations of corruption in implementing development projects emerged, although not on a scale that overshadowed the debt relief success.

  1. Umaru Musa Yar’Adua (2007–2010): Modest Borrowing for Development

President Umaru Musa Yar’Adua inherited an economy with low external debt. During his tenure, the external debt increased modestly from $2.11 billion to $3.50 billion. This rise was attributed to concessional loans aimed at funding development projects, particularly in education, health, and infrastructure. Yar’Adua’s administration maintained a cautious approach to borrowing, prioritizing sustainability.

However, questions were raised about the efficiency of loan utilization, with reports of inflated contracts and funds being siphoned off by corrupt officials. These issues, though less prominent than in later administrations, highlighted systemic governance challenges.

  1. Goodluck Jonathan (2010–2015): Increasing Borrowing for Infrastructure

Under President Goodluck Jonathan, Nigeria’s external debt rose significantly from $3.50 billion in 2010 to $7.30 billion by 2015. This increase was largely driven by efforts to address the country’s infrastructure deficit. The administration secured loans to fund power projects, roads, railways, and other critical infrastructure.

Despite these investments, critics argued that the rising debt levels were not matched by commensurate improvements in infrastructure and economic productivity. Corruption became a recurring theme, with several high-profile cases of misappropriation of funds earmarked for development projects. The absence of robust monitoring mechanisms allowed significant leakages in public funds, undermining the impact of borrowed resources.

  1. Muhammadu Buhari (2015–2023): A Ballooning Debt Profile

President Muhammadu Buhari’s administration marked a dramatic shift in Nigeria’s external debt trajectory. When Buhari took office in 2015, Nigeria’s external debt stood at $10.3 billion. By the end of his tenure in 2023, this figure had ballooned to $42.9 billion, reflecting an increase of $32.6 billion—the highest debt accumulation since 1999.

The Buhari administration’s borrowing strategy was driven by the need to finance critical infrastructure projects, such as railways, airports, and power plants, and to address budget deficits exacerbated by declining oil revenues. However, corruption allegations overshadowed many of these projects. Instances of inflated contracts, uncompleted projects, and opaque procurement processes became rampant, raising doubts about the efficiency of loan utilization. The increasing debt servicing obligations further strained public finances, reducing the funds available for meaningful development.

  1. Bola Ahmed Tinubu (2023–Present): Continuing the Trend

Since assuming office in May 2023, President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has continued the trend of external borrowing. In just over a year, his administration has added $10.23 billion to Nigeria’s external debt, bringing the total to $53.13 billion as of December 2024.

Tinubu’s borrowing has been aimed at addressing fiscal challenges and funding economic reforms. Key loans during his tenure include:

  • $6.45 billion from the World Bank for power projects, education, and renewable energy initiatives.
  • $1.57 billion financing package for healthcare and irrigation projects.
  • $2.209 billion external loan approved to address the 2024 budget deficit.

While these funds are intended to stimulate economic growth, concerns about debt sustainability and potential mismanagement remain prevalent. Critics argue that the entrenched culture of corruption threatens the effective use of these loans. Reports of nepotism, kickbacks, and inflated project costs have already surfaced, raising fears that borrowed funds may not achieve their intended objectives.

Comparative Analysis of Debt Accumulation

President

Years in Office

Starting Debt ($ Billion)

Ending Debt ($ Billion)

Debt Accumulated ($ Billion)

Olusegun Obasanjo

1999–2007

28.00

2.11

-25.89 (debt relief)

Umaru Musa Yar’Adua

2007–2010

2.11

3.50

1.39

Goodluck Jonathan

2010–2015

3.50

7.30

3.80

Muhammadu Buhari

2015–2023

10.30

42.90

32.60

Bola Ahmed Tinubu

2023–Present

42.90

53.13

10.23

Key Takeaways

  1. Obasanjo’s Legacy of Debt Relief: The Paris Club debt relief remains a milestone, dramatically reducing Nigeria’s external debt burden and freeing up resources for development.
  2. Steady Increases Under Yar’Adua and Jonathan: These administrations borrowed cautiously but began a trend of increasing external debt for infrastructure and development projects, though corruption diluted the impact.
  3. Buhari’s Aggressive Borrowing: The Buhari administration significantly expanded Nigeria’s external debt to finance infrastructure, but systemic corruption undermined the benefits of these loans.
  4. Tinubu’s Continuation of Borrowing: The Tinubu administration has maintained the trajectory of external borrowing, but corruption risks remain a critical challenge to achieving sustainable development.

Conclusion

Nigeria’s external debt journey reflects the country’s struggle to balance development needs with fiscal sustainability. While borrowing has been essential for funding infrastructure and addressing economic challenges, the pervasive issue of corruption has consistently undermined the effective use of borrowed funds. Rising debt levels demand not only prudent management but also robust anti-corruption measures to ensure that loans are utilized transparently and efficiently. As Nigeria navigates its economic future under President Tinubu, addressing the twin challenges of debt sustainability and corruption will be pivotal to ensuring meaningful growth and avoiding a debt crisis.

 

Leave a Reply